Lounsbury: Moronic Twit II (some clarifications)

« Sucker Born Every Minute: Iraq Investors Forum, rubes to pick.... | Wolf: Capital Flows »

June 27, 2005

Moronic Twit II (some clarifications)

This is thanks to eerie, who now owes me two hours.
Pundita, the ignorant whinging moron continues her blithering blundering about the Ikhouane and her general incoherence on the topic in general:
http://pundita.blogspot.com/2005/06/pundita-replies-to-questions-about.html

For amusement sake's only (although I suppose continuous mocking of somehow clearly do dim and ill-informed, not to mention such a bleedingly self-referential semi-literate git is perhaps moderately cruel):
1) For the reader who asked why Pundita picked on the British and left the French, Germans, etc. out of it -- because America is more an "Anglo" culture than any other. I speak very bluntly to the British, in the manner of "family talk."

2) It is so well established that Britain became the "terror capital of the world" by the 1990s that it's not necessary to provide data to support the statement. It is widely known that they had an open-door policy for every terrorist organization on the planet.

I'm not sure why I quote this other than to marvel at the talent for asserting exageration as some kind of fact.

What the fuck it has to do with the Ikhouane in Egypt and seeing where they fit in the political calculus of the day, I have no idea, but there it is. Bloody Larouchite whinging on I suppose.

BTW, what the squeeling idiot of a stereotypical Right Bolshy ignorant git of a Know Nothing pandering ideologue is refering to is the United Kingdom's fairly tolerant political asylum position in re political figures with, shall we say unsavoury connexions? Late 1980s through 1990s, something of a don't piss in our pond policy. Nothing new there, see Karl Marx. English liberalism (not American liberalism). Terror capital of the world is merely scare phrasing by people of the Chicken Little The World is Ending blah blah sort.

One should note that the following statement in re "not figuring out" is quite wrong, merely a bit of realism post 11 September regarding UK's "special friend" as it were. As a general matter the policy worked, precious little on English soil MENA radical actions. However, has some unfortunate side effects - but nothing particularly English about it. The United States practiced and practices to an extent the same thing in regards to the IRA, etc.

Real world, kiddies, real world.

Moving along from this irrelevancy, I skip over the hysterics regarding the United Kingdom etc. on the verge of collapse. Hysterics are often amusing, but in this case, this is merely ultra right Tinfoil Hattery at its self deluding pedestrian level of expression. Quite clearly the UK etc. is not in the grips of ... well some end of the world frippery I suppose.

Next, we have the public stoning thingy and we find the silly little of an ignorant Chicken Little Squeeler was raising something in Iran in regards to the Ikhouane - the connexion as one had to suspect when the initial reading occured was simply the vague "Some Muslims did Bad Thing X once somewhere and so this has to be connected to the Ikhouane because Muslim = Ikhouane in my confused benighted twittish thinking."

Of course is might be moderately uncharitable to point out that: (i) it's Iran, a Shia state, has fuck all to do with the Sunni Salafists and Egyptian politics, (ii) stoning really had fuck all to do with the original ludicrous claim that the Ikhouane were leftovers or whatever of the Nazi party in Egypt although one I suppose out of some marginal generosity can perhaps forgive an analytically impaired, hysterical dim wit for her flailing about in a rather pitiful attempt to string together an argument (or some hand waving pretension to a straw man), (iii) that the mere existance of stoning in other (non-Arab esp) countries doesn't say anything about the Egyptian Ikhouane, any more than ostensible Xians in South Africa stoning and necklacing (burning) presumed witches says something about Conservative Xians in the United States (other than stressed rural cultures seem to produce barbarities), (iv) her silly and arch presumption to know something here is rendered yet more comical by her confused blundering and inability to distinguish between countries and different sects in Islam.

In short, precisely what I thought right at the start, a quasi racist blundering about with a broad brush to smear (partly out of blind prejudice, partly out of inempt semi literate ignorance) rather than actually have an informed response to her initial idiotic assertion.

However, this blithering little Know Nothing bludering drooler of an ideological twit is not content to stop digging when her pitiful ignorance is exposed, she desires to charge ahead.

Next there is this wonderful bit of self parody (or in the alternative delightful window into the mind of someone so dimwitted as to lack the barest elements of basic analytical thought) of the confused shrieker as straw man builder:
For the male reader [ndlr: That would be yours truly] who expressed confusion about my application of the word "terrorism" to acts of public stoning and genital mutilation of female children -- I am not going to describe how these mutilations are carried out when not done in a clinical setting. My intention is to inform, not make the reader's blood boil. But the reader may trust that if someone did that to his penis when he was a boy, he would be properly terrorized for life.

Well, what can we say. I suppose it's intriguing to see a flat out admission of utter cluelessness, and the exposure of this idiotic git's clumsy confusion of political terror (what one typicaly means by terrorism in ordinary English language usage by persons who have managed some vague mastery of the language, its basic functions and even a bit of logically joined up writing - a category "pundita" rather clearly does not belong in) with simply being "terrified" or "terrorised" by an event. Obviously a rather clumsy and ill-thought out smear insofar as by this, well, what can one call it? Illogic? Anti-Logic? Negation of logic? Well, regardless, by this illogical blundering obviously drunken driving would be "terrorism" since it can "terrorize" people.

[added note]
Of course, having actually been (and not on motherfucking safaris) to such places where female and male circumcision is practiced, I can assure you, nothing happens under clinical conditions, you pampered Western fatass twit of a whinging moronic git.
[close added note to twit]

But we've really entered into the Orwellian world of newspeak (perhaps the semi-literate whinging little git should actually read some Orwell. The Elephant, his Indian works might - if we were visited by some miracle and the semi-literate git actually was able to follow and understand - actually educate her).

Of course, female circumcision done in backwoods places isn't pretty. But then neither is male circumcision. Same tools.

Of course, as pointed out previously this has fuck all to do with Islam as Islam or even the Ikhouane's political place in Egypt, or her absurdly hysterical unfactual shreiking about Nazi past.

Now, the following few paragraphs are more semi-literate illogical trash of some cesspool of confusion which I have not had enough rhum to inflict upon myself. Rather clearly the author is flailing about trying to latch onto something that will make me stop laughing derisively at her and perhaps throw a bone of pity. Sorry chicky, your blundering about remains contemptibly ill-informed and best characterised by a sort of juvenile confusion of illogic that I might normally associate with 5 year olds.

I only note in closing, because I want to fuck off and get back to real work, that the confused paragraphs asserting some bizarro world conspiracy of Muslim something or other leaders duping something or other blah blah blah about female circumcision is pure ... bunk. If not made up whole cloth, it rather appears to have been derived from some deluded reading of hysterical ultra bigotted Xian fundy sites on Islam in Africa (indeed one suspects that is the case, since it rather appears the semi-literate scrawler known as "pundita" aka drooling twit of ideoglurbe pimping whore for the Know Nothings lacks the barest or even most child-like critical thinking facilities or an ability to tell good sourcing from motherfucking looney tunes (see again Larouche and her other charming cites)).

Conspiracy mongering websites, confused ahistorical (and downright mendacious) blithering about female circumcision, all brought up in blundering attempt to prove.... well I can't really tell, other than I suppose it is some ineffectual attempt at a defence from my charge that she is at once (i) dim, (ii) tedious, (iii) a poor writer, (iv) absurdly illogical and incapable of proper analytical thought, (v) posessing the analytical skills of a small retarded child, (vi) likely a closest racist of that pedestrian polite sort that is afraid of the brown people, (vii) incapable of a properly organized argument and lacking in real entertainment value, (viii) grossly ignorant of the subject she is attempting to treat, and lacking in the natural intelligence to even begin to form an opinion, (ix) deluded as to her own reading comprehension, (x) tedious again, (xi) even more tedious for the scaberous illogic of her arguments that aren't even all that entertaining, (x) too pedestrain to be entertaining.

There you have it. I am done. eerie, don't tell me what this idiotic gimp of a self deluded semi-literate mongerer of putrid ideologue-glurge and driblling moron writes in response. I have better things to do, like laugh at the morons who are putting their dollars into unsecured Iraqi banks. Those dribbling circus freaks entertain me, this idiot merely annoys me.

[Added Thought]

On reflection the thrust of the blundering and blithering concoction of ad hoc assertions, confused smears, and general Chicken Little squeeling about the scary Muslims is "Muslims scary, people not like me very scary, must have people like me." The more potentially supportable, were it not bundled up in the vaguely racist tripe of this concoction of blithering, question might be "will they (the Ikhouane) play ball if they enter into the game."

Well, only one way to find out. Better it be in an organised sense than in Revolution. Not talking to the Shah's enemies, as Zenpundit rightly pointed out, did not change the socio-political calculus for the better.

Or to return to a point a business partern made to me that I love to cite: "Just because he speaks good English, don't be fooled." That is, just because someone has the superficial cultural habits that are familiar to you, don't think that means he's really your amigo. Self delusion is the worst sin of all in the realist world.

June 27, 2005

Moronic Twit II (some clarifications)

Trackback Pings

Comments

Comment Subscription