« Market Madness or Brilliance? US Gov Private Equity for MENA Announced (cross from Aqoul main) | Gaza, the withdrawal »


August 15, 2005

On Diplo Services and Reform

I thought I might be lazy and refer to some comments I made on the site of the dear Zenpundit regarding a perceived need to reform the United States' diplomatic service, at A State Department Worth Creating largely for further discussion here if there was an interest.

In short, should one be lazy, there is a move to 'reform' the United States State Department by the Bush Administration.

Given little information, that might or might not be a good thing. I confess I have acquired a reflexive distaste and distrust for any initiative coming out of the Ibnou Ibn Bush, regardless of content as it strikes me the ideologicial Right Bolshy incomptetence in this Administration runs too deep for good things to happen.

Leaving this aside, I thought, leaving aside what I considered ludicrous accusations of partisanship on the part of the US State Department, there were some decent ideas in there.

Most notably, of course, reforming the system by which US diplos are assigned - as well as promoted. Certainly in regards to the assignment system, the merry go round is quite mad and destructive of expertise.

Other suggestions were idiotic (not Zen's one may add) - calling for more political appointees, which of course would make the State Department look like CPA-Iraq.

By the way, I have to say, reading the underlying article linked first by Zen, I have to admit no small degree of sympathy (although not total accord) for this observation:
“Bureaucratic rearrangements are not terribly important,” Ted Galen Carpenter, vice-president for Defense and Foreign Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington, told ISN Security Watch.

“Making democracy promotion a priority moves US foreign policy in the wrong direction, away from defense and tangible goals, and toward utopian ideals,” he said.

If this fellow hears the same sort of things I hear from the Ibnou Ibn Bush on MENA democracy, his somewhat uncharitable formulation makes much sense.

But to hit the narrow point, it all depends on time frames and risk appetite. There is a real critique to be made against supporting the geriatric 'safe' quasi dictators as Mubarek in the name of short term security and taking the long shot approach of supporting more democracy.

However, one should bloody well do so with a realistic idea of what is actually going to happen.

Posted by The Lounsbury at August 15, 2005 01:49 PM
Filed Under: Egypt , Politics - US FP

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/1942


Comments

I'm not convinced that CPA failed from too many political appointees. Indeed, it looked to me as if the biggest problem there was that State, which ran the CPA, didn't have the institutional commitment to do the right thing, nor the understanding to know what needed to be done.

It may be that more political appointees would have had less understanding (though I don't see how), but at least they would have had the commitment to follow through on the President's instructions.

State muffed CPA not because of too many political appointees, but because of too few.

Posted by: Jeff Medcalf at August 15, 2005 05:30 PM

What the bloody fuck are you talking about? What sort of idiotic revisionist ideo glurge tripe is this comment?

State didn't run CPA, it was staffed by DoD, you witless ignorant idiotic git. DoD even set up its own impossibly inane recruit program.

As to politocos have less understanding, well you can believe whatever bloody fucking fantasy you bloody well want to, I was there, I saw the witless goons and bloody Right Bolshy fools prattling on like bumbling morons about free enterprise and the like without the slightest clue as to what shape Iraq was actually in or how to get to their bloody bright fantasy land.

Commitment to follow through on "Instructions" has fuck all to do with Iraq going wrong, it was CPA-Iraq have no fucking clue as to what sort of world they were getting into.

Good lord, you bloody people are more deprived of sense than I bloody thought.

More politicos, fucking morons....

[Added]
To remedy your fantastical misinformation, I find this wikipedia article useful in giving you a basic grounding in the facts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_Provisional_Authority

as well as this:
http://www.defenselink.mil/policy/isa/nesa/postwar_iraq.html

Amazing smear on State, I have to confess, it probably will even work with your fellow ignorance mongering Bolshy fools.

Posted by: The Lounsbury at August 15, 2005 05:57 PM

Comment Subscription

Email Address: