« Headaches | Afraid the nicknames are right out. »
December 14, 2005
On Torture, New Bolshies and Image
Over the past week, in between my occasional funks over these bloody lungs, and my paranoia regarding my work and the orgy of backstabbing going on, I have had the sad occasion to become reaquianted with US media and in particular news.
Well, it is called news although as far as I can tell, nothing remotely ressembles proper news.
This aside, I have followed with some bemusement the 'debates' over torture in the US media.
I have to say, they are fairly grotesque on some level.
Let me say that my pragmatic self accepts that from time to time outfits like the CIA may have to engage in, well, less-than-Snow-Whitish behaviour. I accept that in the same way I accept that in the Middle East and similar neighborhoods in business one has to turn a blind eye towards certain things.
But in both cases, they should not be the baseline, the standard. They should be exceptional, else quickly a rot sets in.
Turning to the issue of torture, I find it astonishing that so few US commentators understand the profound damage this entire process is doing to the US image and standing. These are not mere trifles, look to the cold hard world of finance, we still care about reputational risk, even if it is more about appearance than fact. Lose your reputation, and your transaction costs skyrocket, to say the least.
The US is losing its brand power, as it were, in the area of government. American society is largely attractive to many, the American story and its socio-economic dynamism (however exagerated and mythologised, still relatively better than most of the world, including the developed world). However, this brand is being pissed away by bumbling fools who do not understand its importance, and think gross, short termism is strategy.
It is, in short, grotesquely stupid. As Talleyrand (a real favourite of mine, although it was likely Boulay de la Meurthe's phrase) is said to have said, "It is worse than a crime, it is a blunder."
However, it is typical of the childish, indeed often Hollywoodish manner in which the Beit Ibn Bush has conducted its affaires.
Regardless, what I found most, well, depressing I suppose, was the plebian ignoramus definitions of "US interests" as if one does not have to continually do business globally. Pure idiot insularity. Now it is well taken one can not let bleeding heart little idjit Leftist protestors who manage to be offended by anything at all dicate one's actions. However, at the same time it is rather trivially obvious that alienating, above all needlessly, large swaths of international opinion not so idiotically and knee-jerkingly opposed to American interests is counter productive.
However, the arguments being bandied about on these "news" programs struck me as rather Bolsheviki in their bizarrely ideoglurghish party line content.
In some sad ways they are perfect illustration of why I have taken to calling a good swath of the American Right, Right Bolsheviks.
Posted by The Lounsbury at December 14, 2005 04:20 AM
Filed Under:
Politics - US FP
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2198
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On Torture, New Bolshies and Image:
» More reactions to Krauthammer et al from chez Nadezhda
Like praktike, two of my favorite bloggers seem to be "all tortured out" -- though each for his own reasons, and each in his distinctive style. They merit extended excerpts. (, two of my favorite bloggers seem to be "all tortured out" -- though each for his own reasons, and each in his distinctive style. They merit extended excerpts. (
Tracked on December 14, 2005 10:45 AM
» More reactions to Krauthammer et al from chez Nadezhda
Like praktike, two of my favorite bloggers seem to be "all tortured out" -- though each for his own reasons, and each in his distinctive style. They merit extended excerpts. (, two of my favorite bloggers seem to be "all tortured out" -- though each for his own reasons, and each in his distinctive style. They merit extended excerpts. (
Tracked on December 14, 2005 11:00 AM
Comments
couldn't aggree more.
welcome to our colective hell.
Posted by: drdougfir at December 14, 2005 06:36 AM
I completely agree. It's something that has been festering in my mind for quite some time.
Dear Mr. President,
As you probably think that "Nietzsche" is a German candy bar, let's put aside, for the moment, the philosophical question of whether allowing the U.S. to engage in torture threatens the essence of what makes the U.S. "exceptional." Rather, let's focus on more pragmatic concerns: allowing torture under any circumstances is a bad idea because it harms U.S. interests.
First, torture has little utility as an information-gathering tool. As even recent news stories have demonstrated, people will tell you pretty much anything you want to hear under torture. They have no incentive to tell the truth and great incentive to tell you lies, especially if they are hostile to your interests which, as you're pulling out their fingernails, they likely are. There are just oodles of examples of this, even in our own history. The North Vietnamese regularly tortured captured Americans and captured Americans regularly said either nothing of interest or packs of outrageous lies, on some occasions actually tricking their captors. We'll likely have even less impressive results as there is no way, God willing, we're ever going to be as good at torture as the North Vietnamese. You should really listen to John McCain on this one as he actually knows what he's talking about, unlike the arm-chair neo-con James Bonds you're getting advice from at the moment.
Nor is the usual first-college-term-dorm-discussion regarding the imminent explosion of nuclear bombs particularly relevant. Most of the terrorists you're likely to catch in these situations are mentally prepared for suicide missions. A few swipes with the rubber hose or electric shocks are unlikely to soften these folks up in time to do you any good.
Because that's the problem. Allowing torture under any circumstances "hardens up" people all around the world. For every person you're able to extract any useful information from by torture, there are a thousand -- or a million -- who would freely give information if America made even a pretense of living up to its ideals. The true power of America is not that it can break people's legs -- any petty dictator can do that. The true power of America is that it represents something people want to cooperate with. By refusing to torture people under any circumstances, you take one small step toward staking out an absolute moral position. The statement "America will never torture people because it's wrong." means America stands for something. America will only be trusted when it will refuse to do some things that are wrong even if they are expedient.
The bottom line here, in case you missed it, Mr. President, is that torturing people will actually lose the U.S. far more vital intelligence than it gains. If you won't stop torturing people because it's wrong, stop torturing people because it's bad policy.
Posted by: Anonymous at December 14, 2005 10:37 AM
And those fools in King Crimson thought they were singing about Vietnam but projecting into the future; perhaps they were more right on than Orwell was in dating 1984. And on one of the most underappreciated great albums of all time:
21st Century Schizoid Man -- King Crimson -- "In the Court of the Crimson King" (1969)
Cat's foot iron claw
Neuro-surgeons scream for more
At paranoia's poison door
21st century schizoid man
Blood rack barbed wire
Politician's funeral pyre
Innocents raped with napalm fire
21st century schizoid man
Death seed blind man greed
Poets' starving children bleed
Nothing he's got he really needs
21st century schizoid man
Posted by: matthew hogan at December 16, 2005 04:18 AM

RSS



