« World Cup Final - fucking spaghetti westerns. | Lebanon - Israel: Come on mates, that dance is getting boring »
July 10, 2006
Updated References - Lapidus History of Islamic Societies, new edition
I just stumbled across this, and might even write something, but I thought a quick note that the A History of Islamic Societies (Paperback) 2nd edition (2002) is out. Well, okay, a few years late, but I hadn't noticed the updated edition. A quick review showed it's well-worth updating.
I also should share that this book is number two on the Amazon recommendations to me:
Distressed Debt Analysis: Strategies for Speculative Investors
by Stephen G. Moyer
Average Customer Review:
Usually ships in 24 hours
Publication Date: November 1, 2004
The robot is smarter than I thought.
Posted by The Lounsbury at July 10, 2006 02:16 AM
Filed Under:
Society & Culture
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2784
Comments
Hi Col-
When you get a moment, your commentary & appraisal on the following (big graphic)PDF would be appreciated.
Yes, years too late to start with but an attempt:
Posted by: mark safranski at July 13, 2006 08:50 PM
Queer thing. I guess this is destined to US military personnel. I presume enlisted, likely of low educational levels. Seems appropriate more or less. Not sure such documentation make much of a difference, unless tied to a larger effort.
I recall saying on a message board in early 03 that I hoped the US military would be intelligent in its use of firepower, attention to "collateral damage" and not achieve Pyrrhic victories, but sadly my fears were realised.
If forces did not even have these kinds of documents, well that is just piss poor.
Posted by: The Lounsbury at July 14, 2006 12:44 AM
Thank you for reviewing it. You are correct, it is intended for enlisted personnel and very junior NCO's I believe, fresh in Iraq from someplace else.
Unfortunately, it is something brand new or at least, of fairly recent vintage.
Posted by: mark safranski at July 14, 2006 01:00 AM
An expert could quibble with some of the things there, but I would regard the quibbling as a mistake. As a quick and dirty orientation on Iraqi society - I presume on a two sided plastified sheet - this is not bad.
Of course, it should have been done in March 03.
Posted by: The Lounsbury at July 14, 2006 01:26 AM
"Of course, it should have been done in March 03."
Agreed.
The Army bureaucracy dragged its feet on cultural awareness because it wanted an in-and-out- operation free of anything that looked like COIN, nation-building or peacekeeping. A good part of it was civilian policy but frankly, the services are supposed to have contingency plans and FAO/DIA staffing in place at the theater HQ.
Posted by: mark safranski at July 14, 2006 03:46 AM

RSS



