« Introducing Ramadan | Bolsheviks »


October 08, 2006

Al Hurra and Market Driven Advice

Related to Tom's recent note on the TV in the Middle East, our old Aqoul amigo Abu Aardvark has some Advice for al-Hurra which I found quite on point, being at once driven by a good understanding of American interests and the media market in region.

I am sure longer term readers will recall some commentary back in the old livejournal days regarding the supposed al Jazeerah privatisation and related Arab Media Policy. Some simple minded commentators cheered without understanding the media market.

The Father of Aardvarks has what I consider rather savvy market-oriented advice, which I am sure this current American Administration will not heed, despite their faux-Conservatism with their magical Right Bolshy inclination to unrealistic Bolshy type transformationalism. Real, honest market driven evaluations and pragmatic market driven policy utterly escapes them.

Among the best advice:

Be realistic about the Arab television market and what you can realistically achieve. The Arab satellite TV market is exceptionally dense and crowded already, and intensely competitive. Most niches have already been filled, by stations which do not have the built-in dead weight of an American identity. Al-Jazeera already has competitors, al-Arabiya already serves as the outlet of choice for American officials who want to reach a wide Arab audience, a wide range of stations offer American or American-style entertainment.

Precisely, and "dead weight" of an American identity captures it precisely, especially given the revelations of Bolshy style agitprop on the part of the Americans (paid placement of progpaganda articles, etc.)

With that in mind, there remains one niche which has not really been filled in which al-Hurra could actually have a competitive advantage: coverage of America and of American politics. ... Al-Jazeera has a good DC-based talk show, From Washington, but other than that America is poorly and thinly covered by most Arab satellite television. Al-Hurra should fill that void by offering intense, detailed, and informative coverage of American politics and society. That coverage should demonstrate the diversity and contentiousness of American society, not try to put a pretty face on America. Consider how useful it could be for Muslims trying to make sense of political Islam to be exposed to the wide range of deep debates among Americans about the role of religion in politics (evangelical Protestants, for instance). That coverage should feature the full spectrum of American views on foreign policy, as well, not just the policies of the current administration. Don't just tell Arabs how great democracy is: show them how democracy works and doesn't work in America, in all its ugliness and beauty. At a minimum, this could challenge monolithic stereotypes about America; beyond that it could illuminate Arab political debates in new ways, and it could even be great TV.

Emphasis added.
While I am not certain how big a market what would essentially be "C-Span in Arabic" might have, given the thirst for original content in the Arab media markets, I can see well-done non-partisan Arabic language coverage of this sort having much influence, even positive influence.

The remainder of the advice strikes me as cogent if not perhaps actually possible.

Posted by The Lounsbury at October 8, 2006 07:31 PM
Filed Under: Business , MENA Region General , Politics - US FP

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2997


Comments

The central weirdness of the whole radio sawa / "Hi" magazine / whatever arm of the propaganda effort is some sort of view of the middle east like it's Eastern Europe in the 80s - all you need to do is walk in with a suitcase full of blue jeans and western pop albums, and you're the king of the country, man!

Weird.

Posted by: Tom Scudder at October 9, 2006 07:56 PM

"The central weirdness of the whole radio sawa / "Hi" magazine / whatever arm of the propaganda effort is some sort of view of the middle east like it's Eastern Europe in the 80s - all you need to do is walk in with a suitcase full of blue jeans and western pop albums, and you're the king of the country, man!

Weird."

This, or rather, the analogy you make bears constant repetition and is the lens through which I belive much of the current administration - at least until fairly recently - has tried to understand the region. This was clear in what they thought the invasion of Iraq would entail in particular. I think it was also clear this summer in the Lebanon diplomacy.

Basically the US wants to play the role it did to Eastern Europe in the Cold War today in the Middle East. But it can't. In reality, the US is perceived not as a liberating force but as an imperial power. To be harsh, IT is the Soviet Union in the current analogy it has constructed and Hezbollah is to the Middle East as Solidarity is to Poland. Or perhaps to put it more mundanely, the US is viewed in the Middle East much as it is and has been in teh Latin American for a long, long time - in other words, not well.

Posted by: Ben P at October 10, 2006 06:46 AM

Comment Subscription

Email Address: