« Dubai, the Attraction | Maghreb Economics »


October 07, 2006

Mr Straw & The Niqab

It appears that For. Sec. Straw's comments on the Niqab, the face veil, have set off a bit of a storm. From The Financial Times to The Times coverage of his original comments regarding prefering women not wear the face veil as divisive through to coverage of The Poodle's craven and inconsistent pandering and on to coverage (the sooner he is gone the better, I await with impatience The New York Times (but British official, I am come on, how about Brit For. Sec.?).

I am not sure if that is good or bad, but it bears some commenting on. First, when I first saw the comments I wasn't sure if he meant the hijab, which would have been annoyingly tedious, or the niqab, which I agree with. I am pleased to see it is about the covering of the face. There is a vast and important difference between the ninja get-ups that are so very Saudi Wahhabite neo-Islamic rot, and a woman covering her hair with a scarf.

The later ranges from the innocuous to the merely tedious. The Niqab, however, is an assertion of Wahhabite neo-Salafi preciousness and hypocrisy, and in the end a set of attitudes incompatible in my opinion with modern society. Period.

In short, I agree entirely with Straw and am perfectly pleased he raised the issue. The whinging on from the mutaslim hypocrite neo-Salafi living in the West (just bloody emmigrate to KSA, two faced bastards) in their perpetual state of offendedness that the West is the West and that their retrograde magical recreation of an Islam that exists only in the fetid imaginations of semi-literate Saudi financed verse mumblers does not obtain in the West nor any normal country does a disservice to the majority of Muslims in the West that are perfectly capable and willing to live in accord with the standards and societies that exist.

I am, however, annoyed with the credulous blithering in the press that reports such things as Muslim leaders were insulted, as this may be more profitably read as "Islamist panderers and religious pimps of neo-Wahhabite retrograde seperatism" were insulted.

The painful inability of Journos to differentiate between your Avergage Mustapha and the short-thobed loons does vast disservice all around.

Posted by The Lounsbury at October 7, 2006 05:32 AM
Filed Under: MENA Region General , Politics - Islam(ic) , Politics - Local , Religion , Society & Culture

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2990


Comments

There's no shortage of reasons to claim to be offended these days, is there? My housemate has coined the term 'outrage entrepreneurs' to describe the people who spread resentment where hitherto there was none.

Posted by: dubaiwalla [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 7, 2006 06:41 AM

Yeah - part of the problem is the term "veil" routinely used in English/English media to mean anything from headscarf/face veil/burqa.

"their perpetual state of offendedness that the West is the West and that their retrograde magical recreation of an Islam that exists only in the fetid imaginations of semi-literate Saudi financed verse mumblers"

LOVE this.

Posted by: secretdubai [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 7, 2006 11:18 AM

It appears the outrage industry is a good deal bigger in Britain than elsewhere in Europe. I don't know why exactly, but I can always whank on about it...

Seems the Brits have opted to diminish problems with new religions and ethnicities by giving a little ground, and keeping down the public vitriol, a cultural Laissez faire policy, but only with regard to minorities. Unfortunately, the result has been that religious groups, from Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus to all types of Christians, have found out outrage works, by virtue of victimization. I have followed MediaWatchWatch a bit, it's surprising how easily the British political elite buys into that.

The British two-party political system is also doing a terrific job of hindering public discourse, and keeping out the oddballs. Not very democratic, though. I somehow have a hunch Blair's Christianity might have something to do with it - we all remember the atrocious Religious Hatred bill, defeated by one vote.

Also, the Brick Lane controversy demonstrated how this policy effectively hands power to bigoted gits within the community. Repression happens within minorities as well as between minorities and a majority.

Posted by: Klaus [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 7, 2006 01:28 PM

Comment Subscription

Email Address: