« In Defence of Wealthy Royals and Against Monopoly | Blonde Girls & Dark Moors »
September 22, 2007
Andalucia?
I confess some puzzlement at the new angle taken by the al Qaeda lunatic murderous scum with respect to blithering on about Andalous and taking back the Mediterranean. The bloody clods can't overturn a single Arab dictator of moderate incompetence, what the bloody hell is the angle on Andalous.
Yes, yes, I know the history, and can see some vague logic in the rhetorical flourish, but directing bombing attacks against the Spanish and French - as well as other Euros - strikes me as a real strategic mistake, on several levels. First, blowing up engineers working on such public works of clear public interest as dams I do not think is going to win over any Maghrebine sympathisers, rather I think it plays into the counter argument of the moderates that the entire Al Qaeda movement is a bunch of shaggy nihilistic lunatics that have as much to do with Islamic theology proper as my dear corner madman....
(who I must confess is actually well-educated and seems to have studied Islamic Sciences before going, well, mad, but in a nice charming way - other than the whole lack of bathing and ranting thing. Much better than blowing people up, one has to admit, the ranting and the not bathing. And the staring, he really can drill a hole in a wall... Really quite a charming fellow when he's not in one of his episodes of denouncing wickedness, sloth -plenty of that- and various sundry sins. Very nice to the nieghbour hood Israelites as well. Funny world really.)
Further, this move can only have the effect of causing Europe to be slightly more sympathetic to the Americans utterly incompetent "War on Terror" (or more clearly, war on Islamic takfiri radicals - well should be defined as such), and boost activity / engagement of the far more competent French intelligence services (at competent with respect to having networks penetrating groups). The 1995 GIA turn on the French brought them no rewards, one would think people would learn.
In any case, this is a most unpleasant little move, as I believe I am quite the profile these people want to blow up. I think I shall be requesting hotel rooms with windows not facing any major avenues for my upcoming Algeria stay. Bad enough I have to stay a bloody long time.
But back to the question: can anyone clarify for me the immediate thinking on this new Andalous angle (again commentary can spare me both the history and the basic logic, I am puzzled by this particular resurgence and the desire to go after the French and the Spanish, and Euros).
Posted by The Lounsbury at September 22, 2007 08:41 PM
Filed Under:
Politics - Islam(ic)
,
The Maghreb
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/3458
Comments
Attacking French expats could perhaps work with the Algerian Salafi crowd that they're trying to attract, nurtured on Liberation War tales. Possibly elsewhere too -- bear in mind that they aren't looking to recruit ordinary Mohamed Doe, who is of course horrified by these threats; their only interest is how it plays with people who are already deep into the Salafi fringe.
Spanish, seems plain dumb from a tactical angle -- if anything, they should be overempahsizing how secure Spain can be after pulling out from Iraq, so as to cast it as a real political victory, even if it wasn't.
As for the overall line of thought ... well, they are a sect, a cult far past, say, the Scientology movement in its sheer nuttiness. I'm sure it makes excellent sense in their insulated little world of paranoia and cosmic battles. Take bin Ladin, who has certainly proved himself successful as far as terrorism & media utilization goes -- the fact that he has been heard ranting about how the USA will be plunged into civil war as individual states secede, I think says a lot about their level of political consciousness. They're smart people, and good at what they do, but too out of touch with reality to understand their position fully.
Posted by: alle at September 22, 2007 10:12 PM
I don't know the logic behind this either. I suppose this is a drive at recruiting Algerians and Moroccans - and the fact that Spain and France are singled out I think isn't so much linked to colonial history as to the special relationship that Morocco and Algeria have with these two countries. France and Spain attract most Algerian and Moroccan illegal migrants, and, in Morocco's case, there's a geographical closeness to Spain - if young unemployed or underpaid young men in Morocco and Algeria have one common dream, it is to settle in France or Spain. The fact that is hard to do so, legally or clandestinely, leads to resentment. It is probably not a coincidence that Tétouan, in Northern Morocco and formerly part of the Spanish occupation zone in Morocco, and still very much hispanophone, is the city in Morocco which has sent most salafi fighters to Iraq. This is just wild speculation on my part, but Al Qaïda might be trying to intensify their recruitment in Morocco and Algeria - and possibly in the maghrebi communities in France and Spain.
As for winning the public opinion in Morocco and Algeria, I think that Al QaÎda is above such petty concerns - they haven't bent over backwards to win Iraqi public opinion, it seems...
And the al Andalus-gimmick is used simply because everyone who's been to school knows about the myth of Islam's golden age - citing al Andalus is actually common fare not only with islamists, but also with secularists & liberals, for different reasons of course.
Posted by: Ibn Kafka at September 22, 2007 10:44 PM
Well, yes, everyone loves to cite to Al Andalous in a sort of vague, hand waving oh weren't those great times way. Hear it all the time.
But the bloody reconquest part.
The levels of stupid in that.... I guess Alle convinces me. The Cult may actually believe in this tripe.
Reminds me of the breathless Salafi loony tune who used to be my friend (before disappearing, I think for a free trip to the Sahara, but who knows) who would always regale me with bizarre predictions of America or UK or Germany converting soon. All based off of bad math and even worse reasoning.
Well, of course personal interest is the angle here. I believe I do fit most of the profile of their now declared targets. Really tedious this.
(and I used to vacation in Tetouan, very strange city I have to say, not sure if it needed more or less kif)
Posted by: The Lounsbury at September 22, 2007 11:15 PM
Targeting Europeans does have the benefit of appealing to those who see them as "crusaders" out to get the Muslim world, as well as tapping old anti-colonial hostility, and most of all I suppose hitting Europeans is a way of keeping oneself in the eye of the world media, showing that one is an International Threat? It does seem to work, sad to say - a local journalist kidnapped or blown up in Iraq, for example, isn't going to get as much attention as a Westerner in the same position.
Posted by: SP at September 23, 2007 04:13 PM
Reminds me of the breathless Salafi loony tune who used to be my friend (before disappearing, I think for a free trip to the Sahara, but who knows) who would always regale me with bizarre predictions of America or UK or Germany converting soon.
Maybe he was reading Mark Steyn in The Spectator.
Posted by: Antiquated Tory at October 4, 2007 10:22 AM
The inverse rather I think. Steyn wants to believe the fevered imaginations of the neo-Salfine.
Posted by: The Lounsbury at October 4, 2007 09:22 PM

RSS



