« On Contacting Lounsbury | Lounsbury Trivia »


February 24, 2008

Emerging MENA & Global Froth

Given the real potential for a catastrophic melt down in the US, driven by a credit bubble and solvency crisis, and the unknowns of the overall US securitised assets market crisis (sub-prime etc), nicely boosterish articles such as this FT Funds article on MENA markets being the next hot thing make me smile. My thinking since the US credit crisis began has been that until the crisis triggers a global recession, Emerging Markets are going to do better on the basis that "you know what you don't know" or rather the transparency issues are well-known versus the US where suddenly what one thought one knew.... well, who the fuck knows where the bad instruments are now. For all that, the boosterism of observations like "Funds investing in the Middle East and North Africa could be the next hot spot for investors seeking high returns in emerging markets, as some report returns in excess of 50 per cent" strike me as buying into the market after the opportunity has already moved on. 2 years ago this was a good deal. Now?

But nevertheless, the logic of watching past returns to predict future returns is apparent (or herd mentality):

“Funds are likely to see increased interest in the region through investor rotation as they look for the next place to make money,” said Randal Goldsmith, a fund analyst at Standard & Poor’s Fund Services. “In 2007, the focus was on the emerging market leaders, the Bric countries [Brazil, Russia, India and China]. Frontier markets could be next.”

Booming economies underlay the success of the funds, according to S&P. In 2007, markets in Gulf Co-operation Council countries flourished: Oman’s stock market rose 51.4 per cent and even the worst performer, Bahrain, managed growth of 15.8 per cent. Away from the Gulf the picture was equally sunny with a range of market returns from 54.9 per cent (Egypt) to 20.9 per cent (Jordan).

“The economies have obviously had a massive boost from the price of oil, which has risen tenfold over the last 10 years,” said Mr Goldsmith. He was optimistic, however, that there should be some resilience even if the price of oil were to fall. “There is some sustainability built in to the growth. A lot of the money is being ploughed back into infrastructure, and developing infrastructure can take years.”

The Bermuda-domiciled EFG Hermes Egypt fund delivered 61.9 per cent in dollar terms in 2007, driven to an extent by an overweight position in real estate and an underweight one in construction and telecoms stocks. EFG Hermes also offers a more broadly based regional fund, the Meda fund, which returned 50.4 per cent in dollars, beating its benchmark MSCI Arabia ex-Saudi Arabia index by 4 percentage points.

The prospects for future investment returns in the region are strong, according to Shirish Raut, manager of Oman-domiciled Oryx Fund.

If one looks at the PE ratios in the region, above all in that narrow range of local securities that are liquid enough to get into such global funds, they're nuts. They imply double digit growth as is rarely seen.

That being said, Goldsmith's citing of the oil boom money flowing back into region and into more productive investment such as long-term infrastructure of real value (ex-Dubai's increasinlgy nutty luxury market speculation) has some real truth to it. But listed equities are already overbought, the missing value already realised. Investment in private placement - PE to VC - above all in markets that can realise off-shoring growth, that makes a lot of sense if you have the right partner, as even with a global recession, say late 08 through 09 into early 10, a strategic 5 year vision should still give you excellent value.

Posted by The Lounsbury at February 24, 2008 02:23 PM
Filed Under: Business

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/3577


Comments

Unwise as it is I have studiously avoided understanding the arcana of Money. But noting that the ca. 50% growth in the Chinese stock market is universally regarded as dangerously overheated, how can these cited returns be found reasonable and healthy; and don’t those returns signify capital flight from the economies receiving investment? How can that possibly be healthy for them?
No doubt my questions reflect nothing but my ignorance; If you would condescend (I choose that verb in judgment on myself, and out of respect for your mastery) to enlighten me I would be grateful.
Thanks.

Posted by: felix culpa [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 25, 2008 08:59 PM

I frankly don't follow the muddle above.

But presuming I understand what you are trying to say:
(i) Returns in MENA markets were coming off of very low levels, and initially justifiable given low valuations for some equities. Overall, well, that's a harder call. There has certainly been clear signs of overheating - domestically driven - in pricing. In 04-05 I thought there were deals. Now, at price-earning ratios in the 20s plus for cheaper equities.... well I don't have the same opinion. Partially this is due to too little investing opportunities.
(ii) Capital flight? From where? The comment makes no sense. Economies receiving investment are by definition attracting capital. Productive investment is a good thing, in general. One can of course properly worry about speculative hot money bidding up asset prices, a la Asian in the early 90s.

Posted by: The Lounsbury at February 26, 2008 08:56 PM

The other issue I wonder about - and yes, I would very much like a Lounsbury opinion on my ignorant musings here - is the lack of sophistication in instruments and strategies available on the Gulf financial exchanges. Long-only, no derivatives, no apparent appetite to do anything but buy and wait for your 25% bare minimum returns. Returns which the market in the run to $100 oil has generally provided. But what happens when the oil price goes to say $60 and sits there for 2 years and there's no way for an investor to hedge with some puts, or even if they bail out they then have nowhere else to put the remainder of their capital or at least their capital sits there stagnant with no return (as if it wasn't bad enough already taking huge inflation haircuts). What do these markets do in such a scenario? Do they just sell off 75% and stagnate until the oil price is up again? Or does greater use of derivatives provide new opportunities and spread plays?

Posted by: Non-Arab Arab at March 1, 2008 11:01 AM

I am not sure I see the question.

With few exceptions, equity investing culture is brand new, one can say evening only emerging in the past ten years. Since you cite oil, I presume you're thinking of the Gulf markets.

It would be extraordinary to see financial practice immediately be of the same development as say NY or London.

The markets, if they are oil driven will crash - simple enough. Just like old time markets. Sit and wait to come back.

I don't see derivatives becoming used for another generation - ex outsiders using.

For non-Gulf markets, I might have other answers but lazy at the moment.

Posted by: The Lounsbury at March 2, 2008 07:17 AM

Post a comment





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Comment Subscription

Email Address: